Why Marriage: The History Shaping Today’s Debate Over Gay Equality Reviews
Whу Marriage: Thе History Shaping Today’s Debate Over Gay Equality
Angrу debate over gay marriage hаѕ divided thе nation аѕ nο οthеr issue ѕіnсе thе Vietnam War. Whу hаѕ marriage suddenly emerged аѕ thе mοѕt explosive issue іn thе gay struggle fοr equality? At times іt seems tο hаνе come out οf nowhere-bυt іn fact i
List Price: $ 14.95
Price: [wpramaprice asin="0465009581"]
[wpramareviews asin="0465009581"]
Related posts:
- Train Your Wife. Create a Happy Marriage (Happy Marriage Manuals) Reviews
- Major Problems in the History of American Families and Children (Major Problems in American History (Wadsworth))
- Marriages and Families: Changes, Choices and Constraints (7th Edition) Reviews
- Points & Counterpoints: Controversial Relationship and Family Issues in the 21st Century: An Anthology Reviews
- Train Your Husband. Create a Happy Marriage (Happy Marriage Manuals)
Why Marriage? The history shaping today’s debate over gay equality,
Why Marriage? The History Shaping Today’s Debate Over Gay Equality written by George Chauncey describes the history that has set the stage for the debate over gay marriage today. The book begins with a history of gay and lesbian individuals in the US and their struggle to enter and gain acceptance in the public sphere. Up until the 1930s during the great depression gay and lesbians were not viewed with such critique and demonization. During the great depression there was a push for traditional families when men lost their jobs and no longer had the same role in their family and found homosexuals to be a threat. Continued discriminatory practices continued in the following decades and gay clubs and restaurants were closed and individuals presumed to be homosexual were jailed. During the 1950′s Broadway plays were band from having gay themed plays and an agreement was made in Hollywood not to represent gay characters or issues. During the 1970′s public opinion was shifting and heterosexual couples were living together before marriage. Birth control was gaining popularity and sex was being viewed as a means of pleasure and not just for reproduction. During the 1980s through the 1990s the AIDS epidemic started and gay men were both stereotyped and feared as being diseased by the public and healthcare workers. Gay men came together with the support of female activists, who had experience in health due to work in the women’s movement, to battle discrimination. In 1987 78% of the US viewed homosexual relations as wrong. During the 1990s gay characters could be seen in the media and movies such as Philadelphia were hits and gay support was increasing significantly. In 1993 the military enacted a “Don’t ask, Don’t tell” policy on homosexuality forcing many gay individuals to lead a double life. Chauncey describes how marriage has evolved overtime from a system of control, where people wed for political reasons and one could not choose a partner, to a system of love and compassion. Since the nineteenth century marriage has evolved and the freedom to choose a partner is viewed as a right, gender roles with in married families have changed and no longer need a stereotypical “man” or “woman”, marriage is economically beneficial and often necessary, and is thought of less on the basis of religion, even though some churches do allow it. Marriage is desired by gay and lesbian couples because without the privilege they are second class citizens with no rights and protection if a partner becomes ill, as seen in the AIDS epidemic, or dies along with protection for their children. In 2004 gay couples received the right to marry in Massachusetts and California along with other counties throughout the US. Gay couples flocked to get married but this ability to wed was short lived when President Bush two weeks later set forth a constitutional amendment to end gay marriage.
Taking notes through this reading allowed me to reflect on what I was writing its significance to the overall issue of gay marriage. I found this to be very helpful in understanding the context of this book. There was a lot of information presented and many different movements were occurring simultaneously so I benefited from taking short breaks to layout what I had learned within the greater picture. The tone of this book was informative and I did not find it to be biased. Being unbiased was important to me because I believe individuals from any walks of life would benefit from this book and not feel as if they were being attacked. I liked the way Chauncey approached the subject from a very factual and less philosophical frame. When reading similar information on gay marriage the argument tends to be emotional and philosophical but the factual way this book was presented was much more beneficial to me as a reader. Chauncey is able to present the material from a factual approach because he is an expert in the field and has testified as an expert witness in several major gay rights cases. He was also a head author of the Historians’ Amicus Brief in Lawrence v. Texas (2003), which resulted in the Supreme Court’s landmark decision overturning the nation’s remaining sodomy laws.
Topics to discuss:
1)Does the AIDS epidemic still affect gay culture? Gay individuals were affected personally, socially, economically, and politically. Gay individuals were personally affected in the 1980s because the majority of those infected with the disease were gay men. These men suffered from health issues and had to pay inflated amounts for healthcare because pharmaceutical companies did not want to treat a “gay” disease. Healthcare professionals were also scared of the disease. Gay individuals were targeted as social outcasts and heterosexual people did not want to eat or drink from where an individual with AIDS may have eaten or drank from. Gay partners had no right to visitation and upon death lost financial stability and security. Politically…
Read more
Was this review helpful to you?
|Terrific,
A riveting analysis of the question of gay marriage that casts light on both its social and historical implications, placing the gay rights movement in the context of comparable 20th century movements defending and promoting the rights of blacks and women.
Was this review helpful to you?
|